Scientific controversy concerning radioisotopic dating 100 online dating love romance friendship
Even then, the scatter of the data points for the isochron is usually significant, perhaps hinting that the linear plot more closely models a mixing line than an isochron.
Rare-earth dating is plagued by the same questionable four assumptions as the K-Ar, Ar-Ar, and Rb-Sr dating methods, and the rocks they supposedly date continue to exhibit behavior that is just as consistent with a mixing line as an isochron line.
The half-life of Sm is so long that even for geologically significant periods of time (hundreds of millions of years) little change occurs in the Nd isotope composition of rocks; thus, a number of rocks that start with slightly different initial ratios and Sm/Nd may produce linear arrays on an isotope correlation diagram with no age significance.
So what else do the observations say about these REE dating methods?
Pope Francis has stated: "God is not a demiurge or a magician, but the Creator who brought everything to life...
intrusion near Brisbane, Australia, yielded ages for the rock formation from 2,923 to 442 million years. Speculation, conjecture, and reasonable hypotheses all have their place in the scientific process, but they are not scientific fact and should never be presented as such.
The creation–evolution controversy began in Europe and North America in the late 18th century, when new interpretations of geological evidence led to various theories of an ancient earth, and findings of extinctions demonstrated in the fossil geological sequence prompted early ideas of evolution, notably Lamarckism.
In England these ideas of continuing change were at first seen as a threat to the existing "fixed" social order, and both church and state sought to repress them.
Secularist scientists want us to accept their circular arguments and improbable assumptions as scientific fact, despite the fact these same scientists often push aside the scientific method itself.
Using the various types of radioisotope decay as clocks does not produce consistent results, nor are those results verifiable by observational evidence.